thanks for that capn . can i ask where you are getting these pics from , would love them .
Used google Images.
First batch was “Quad forty uss missouri”
Second batch was “20mm Iowa Class”
thanks capnmac82
Holy smoke, Steve. Where do I begin? You went large…booya.
Whats funny is that I am currently watching the youtube bloke you mentioned. I often thought maybe I would build one of these when I reach retirement. But man… though I’d have more time, not sure I’d want to tackle it. Good for you Mate! I sure wish the subscribe feature was working for me because I will miss all your updates as they happen.
Nice work on the bulb feature. How crazy that was not added in the design of the model. As meticulous as youtube guy is, I don’t think he caught that omission.
I am laughing at all the banter. Painted shaft, not painted, what a hoot. Good stuff though. You have a lot of expertise here to help.
Now I know where Capn is camping. Lol.
Keep up the good work Steve. Looking good!
Midwest Model Shop? They (he and the wife) are uilding a 1/200 Titanic. I’m biased, but his Arizona may have turned out better than his Missouri.
The PRC companies (Merit as well as Trumpy) seem to fall afoul of this. If it’s not in the CAD, it doesn’t get into the CAM, so, it’s not moulded. That may jest be down to how they shop the CAD work out. If all you do is use the flat drawings and never check them agains actual photos (or you Government restricts things like Google Images) your output is kind of limited. Ship plans often have artisitc license in them until you get to the actual Builder’s Plans (and those can lead astray–one of an Officer’s duties on arriving at a new ship is going over the “official” plans to see where the specific ship differs from the “Class” plans–and a number of Binders of Inforamation fro mthe Type Command).
Camp? Like any good officer I tour about gathering information, sharing as required, and making a list to ‘share’ with the XO [:)]
That’s them. I am following the Titantic build as well. I have not viewed the Arizona build but I will. I have to hand it to the guy in that these kits are massive projects, especially with all the PE. The guy seems to have a demanding fulltime job too. Good thing his wife seems to support his hobby too.
Interesting info. It is just a shame more attention to detail is not made.
Lol. You crack me up sir. Good job!
Steve… seeing all that PE you have to do makes my eyes roll back and I go into seizures. You are a good man, Charlie Brown. Good luck and I look forward to the progress reports.
thanks for looking in steve , I may end up looking like charlie brown after all these %$#^ guns [:D]
I am very thankful the capn is on board too mate . good man to have around .
Nice work! A very ambitious project, to be sure. The Pontos set is very comprehensive and goes a long way in helping the kit, overcoming many shortcomings.
Trumpeter is known for producing kits with some accuracy issues. But they offer subjects one can’t find anywhere else. Large 1/200 scale kits have a lot of “wow factor”.
One of the more conspicuous shortcomings of the kit is that Trumpeter included the wrong 5"/38 twin-gun mounts, an easy mistake to make. The Trumpeter kit includes Mk.32 mounts, which were fit to cruisers, aircraft carriers, reconstructed pre-war battleships like Nevada and Pennsylvania, and other ships where weight was in important consideration. Fast battleships of the Iowa class, South Dakota class, and North Carolina class were fit with heavier Mk.28 mounts, which have a slightly different shape and thicker armor. Missouri and Iowa carried the heavy Mk.28 mounts, not the Mk.32s included in the Trumpeter kits.
Click here for a US Navy drawing of the heavy Mk.28 Mount, fully dimensioned.
Click here for a US Navy drawing of the lighter Mk.32 Mount, fully dimensioned.
The two mounts have a similar shape and the same width but the Mk.28 is taller by nearly 6 inches and the Mk.32 is longer aft. This makes the Mk.32 look squater. To the casual viewer, the difference in the shape of the front of the mount is more noticeable. The vertical portion at the bottom is taller on Mk.28 mounts.
Mk.32 mounts are correct for Essex class carriers, USS Saratoga CV-3, Baltimore and Cleveland class cruisers, rebuilt battleships Nevada, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, California and West Virginia, and other ships, too.
Early Atlanta class cruisers carried Mk.29 mounts which were dimensionally identical to the Missouri’s Mk.28s. Later ships of the Atlanta class (also called Oakland class) carried the lighter Mk.32s.
Another configuration of twin-gun 5"/38 mount was commonly fit to Allen M. Sumner and Gearing class destroyers. Called the Mk.38 mount, it was even lighter yet and a bit smaller. Mk.38s can be easily identified by the conspicuous, external rotation stops at the bottom of the front of the glacis (frontal armor plate). Some Coast Guard cutters like Wind class icebreakers and some post-war Italian destroyers were fit with Mk.38s.
Correct-for-Missouri aftermarket Mk.28s are available, if interested.
Again, great job and am enjoying your build!
cheers for that info Model monkey , but I’m still a bit of a rookie at this PE caper , think I will stick to what pontos has supplied . but i appreciate the sediment mate .
finally got all 520 pieces cut off and bent . that has to be the worst part of this build . [:S]
bought this tamiya mini PE bender , came as I started this part thank the lord . they are really good .
Such patience.
Those are good pliers, and worth the dollars.
Steve, how is the battle going?
Hi There!
Hey! yer talkin about my favorite Hunting Rifles! Damage Control and Snipes were battle stationed in mount one with one Gunner’s mate petty officer. We consistantly beat the other gunners in excercises. We got our shooting ’ E " Five times in one year and landed some right in some laps in the Tonkin Gulf thing!
I guess being raised in the South Mostly and Hunting and Fishing at an early age made us Dixie-Brats better shooters! Nine times out of ten we were OFF the Gun Director! No-One could hit the broad side of a Barn when on it! They said there weren’t nuttin wrong with it, Pshaw!
Oh Boy!
Very nice job on those Bofors! Recoil Springs had a cover on some of them. We had two with covers on the springs on my ship! The rest, Very well Maintained and kind a metallic black color!
Hmmm;
Absotively Posolutely Correct ! HooYah, ya nailed that!
steve , it doesn’t go very well at the moment mate , my wife finally surcome to an illness and passed away last week , the funeral is on wednesday , sometime next week or so I might feel like getting back into it . this is a hell of a way to retire I can tell you .
So sorry to hear that. Don’t rush back, but do things to keep busy. Prayers for you and yours.
Went through the same thing in 2014. Still not back.
Oh my gosh, Steve. I am SO sorry to hear this. This is aweful and the worst news. Nothing I can say will make a difference. Just know that if I can help in some way, let me know.
Yes. The model will wait.
I am sorry for your loss too, GH. Heartbreaking.
Oh My:
I am so sorry to hear that.I went through that Twice. I will have you and your Safety in my prayers!