Hi Folks,
I’ve seen a few armour modelling tutorials and build logs which use various methods to enhance the texture of moulded parts to represent cast armour. Some of you have used putties, others have used polystyrene cement, either way to excellent effect…
Would love to try this out on a future build, but am concerned about making irreparable damage to the model by using the aforementioned techniques. I came across this product from AK Interactive, which is an acrylic product that appears a bit more user-friendly and easier to correct if the finish is not satisfying. Have any of you had experience with this product?
The other question, is how much texture is too much texture? Granted a flat surface isn’t all that interesting, but I can’t help but feel some modellers end up overdoing their armour texture particularly where the original armour is supposed to be rolled steel plate. This is possibly a result of modelleres taking inspiration from 80-90 year old museum pieces, some of which have been left in the elements for decades or abused as range targets before undergoing restoration. Between the ravages of time, weather, and wartime-quality steel milling, this is bound to attract pitting and additional texture that we wouldn’t expect from a vehicle in service that’s undergoing regular maintenance…
Panzer IV Ausf F in Moscow’s Victory Park - Much of the additional texture here is likely a product of decades of corrosion and pitting rather than a reflection of its condition in 1941


