Flat Finish: Dullcote vs MicroMark Flat vs Winsor &Newton Acrylic Matt Varnish

After reading Chrisk-k’s enthusiastic endorsement of the W&N acrylic matt varnish I had to check it out.

Coming from the model rr world, we like dead flat finishes. Dullcote is a staple. But with my new indoor paint station, I would like to get away from the high VOC stuff.

So I ran a simple test using Dullcote, the W&N, and some MicroMark Flat (made by Vallejo).

The Dullcote was thinned with lacquer thinner. The MicroMark with Vallejo Thinner. The Winsor & Newton with distilled water with a couple drops of flow aid.

Perhaps not so visible in the pic, but the Dullcote and MicroMark Flat were really close in appearance: Dead flat. The W&N was more of a dull satin finish.

The Dullcote and MicroMark dried much faster (could be handled sooner) than the W&N.

The MicroMark Flat and the W&N Matt Varnish had smoother finishes than the Dullcote.

I was impressed with the MicroMark flat.

Comments welcome.

Mitch

I spray the Vallejo and W&N matt varnishes straight out of the bottle. Unless I want to heavily weather a model, I use the W&N. I’ve watched a ton of videos and examined photos of WWII & Vietnam AFV’s, and most of them don’t look dead flat.

Glad you commented, Chrisk-k.

No disagreement. We use the dead flat for old freight cars and such. I’m new to the airplane world and can see the value in a satin finish.

Two great low-VOC products to add to the arsenal.

I thin the Windsor and Newton varnish with Tamiya white cap thinner and it works real well. I mix it Matt and Satin together so its not quite dead flat. Best flat clears I’ve ever used.

I thought the W&N Matt was kind of satin-ey, compared to the other two. But I’ll give it a shot with the Tamiya thinner. I’m curious if that helps it dry any faster, as well.

Thanks for the tip.

Seems to dry to the touch within 10 min or less.