in the middle of 70+ mph winds and hurtling rains, you go out to move your van from a window on one side of the house to a window on another side of the house to cover for the shifting winds, and you realize…
Hey! The top compartment of my van looks like a Sherman hull!
oh yes there is such a thing as too much FSM. i was so bored on a train one day that i read the thing cover to cover thrice. i gave that particular copy to a friend… and he used it to line his birdcage ! oy veh
Too much FSM? Hmmm, that’s an interesting condition you have. I suggest you lie down in bed for a couple of days and read your whole collection, from begining to end, just to get it out of your system.
Is it just me or has FSM gone down hill. Let me explain, for two weeks I waited to read the article on washing a Tiger (my fav. modeling subject) then the mag arrives, and to my disappointment the article takes me all of 2 mins. to read and contains nothing new, then to top it off it’s continued next month…what is that! Are sales that bad that they have to resort to trapping consumers into buying the next month’s magazine? The article on figures was good, but still lacked substance. The 'Super Detail" aircraft was neat, but how many modelers out there go into that type of detail. Now they have a column about “the forum” to fill the pages; if I wanted to read what is going on in the forums (worked I’m here now) I WILL READ THE FORUM! Don’t feed me regurgitated information! There is tons of modeling subjects they could cover, How to do staic grass, how to use PE properly, tools not normally thought of, proper use of Putty, cleaning and care of an airbrush, how to make a good compressor set-up. I could go on and on, but I think you get my point. Give us useful information! Well off my soap box…and back to real life! Sorry for the ramble!
Sometimes the articles contained in the issue are quite sparce or simplistic. However, there are an equal number of articles that have contained tips and/or techniques that are quite unique. I have the entire series of FSM minus the original trial issue. I have noticed some “recycling” of articles over the length of the magazine, however in defence of FSM most have been updated to incorporate new items and usage to keep the hobby current.
As far as subjects to be covered the simplest solution I think would be submission by you, me or any of the members here. This will keep the magazine moving forward and limit the repitition or vagueness.
In regards to the issue of how far will modeler’s go?
I personally, really enjoy seeing the extremes that some modellers take ordinary kits to. This level of detail showcases not only the individual modeler as a skilled and detail oriented craftsman/ woman but also affords the challenge to better ones own skills to achieve a higher standard and ultimately an awe inspiring piece at the end.
I have over the years seen many magazines for modellers. The worst offender by far was Military Modeler / Scale Modeler for recycling old materiel and limiting itself to only a handful of new submissions monthly while showcasing the same modeller month after month. The magazine finally ended and left a void that FSM has filled and re-defined quite well.
After all of the foregoing my best advice would be to send in a submission to the Editorial Staff and solicit the magazine to add new items monthly. Ask for the additions of sections for beginners, intermediates, advanced and a showcases of masterclass modelers works. Tips and Techniques for and from each of these groups. Maybe even a few yearly special issues of just reference photos, drawings, paint schemes for one specific type or subject.
After all FSM is just a magazine. It’s readership is what drives it and fills its pages and prolongs its. It’s up to us to foster the direction it takes us in.
Now I will get down off my soapbox and get back to the workbench.
I have been reading FSM for decades now and I have always been fairly happy with their offerings. As for the multiple part article, they have been doing that for years. I have a subscription so realy it does not bother me, I’ll just read about it next month. I agree that some articles seem very basic. Maybe thats cause I’ve been doing this for a few decades. When I see an article about which glue to use I know that it was not realy targeted at me but at someone who is entering the hobby. I remember as a young lad reading those types of articles with great interest because I did not know. I still read them, but I dont gain as much as I used to, the learning curve is not as steep as it was back in the day.
I aplaud FSM for keeping a healthy balance of “been there, done that, got the T shirt” to “holy crap look at what this guy did with this ship.” Maybe I’ll try some of those techniques on my next build. We are not all on the same page of music here, some of us are learning how to play jingle bells, while others of us are on mosart. Its gotta be tough to be a FSM editor.
As for some of the articles that you have mentioned that should be done, they have done in past issues. I am sure that they will be done again in futuer issues and thats just alright with me. It lets me know whats new out there, and lets a new guy know some basic information to keep his interest level in the hobby up.
As for you know you have been reading too much FSM when: When you wear the covers off of past issues rereading them over and over again. Ill bet I’ve got that last 6 months worth memorized by now. Come on mail call, I need a new FSM! LMAO
You know you’ve been reading too much FSM AND spent too much time on this Forum when you notice that none of the kits you are building show any progress at all [sigh]