Why German armor?

Not that I want to get in a debate about the wrongdoings during the war, I just want to state my case on why I am building my 1/16 Tiger I as Wittmann’s S04 (with the 88 kill rings)

As a tank Commander, he was one of the best. He was both feared and respected by those he faced. In many an interview I see now, with US & British tank crews who faced him, they all say that they respected him, because he knew battle tactics so well. As for being part of the SS, yes he was. Up to what point he supported, we will never know. He was however, loyal to the Panzer crews he served with. We know this for a fact.

I also understand that, those 88 rings meant lives were lost, by many Allied crew members. In the same manner of speaking, if you were to build a Corsair Aircraft model, say by Pappy Boington, would you not put the little Japanese Rising Sun flags below the cockpit canopy, that represented kills?

I have to agree with Ron and Dwight, I think the draw of modeling German armor is simply a function of the incredible variety of vehicles the Germans were able to field during the war, as well as many of their innovative aspects. There were the basic tanks, and then all the varieties. For example, there was the Panther A, D, G, F, the Bergepanther, Jagdpanther, and the experimental Coelian Panther. And just look at all the things the Germans did with the Czech (?) 38(t) chassis: Marder III, IIIM, and Hetzer, just to name a couple.
I guess the other reason I build German armor is because the machines have that LOOK about them–ominous, intimidating, and powerful–that “don’t-mess-with-me” appearance; and maybe kind of “stylish” in their own peculiar sort of way. Comparatively speaking, the Sherman, IMO, was just plain butt ugly (Sorry, Robert–no offense intended).
Gip Winecoff

That’s a deep, moral question (a couple of posts back) inherent in any military modelling. These machines were designed to kill; it’s as simple as that. To me, who they were designed to kill is irrelevant. There is honor and a sense of rightousness on all sides of battles. In the end, the victors decide who was truly “right” (as far as recorded history is concerned).

I build models of a wide variety of subjects because of a fascination with machines, and perhaps an even deeper fascination with why humans do with them what they do.

Oh yeah, and the Germans made some really big tanks.
I like really big tanks![:D]

I wasn’t going to post on the ethic question that’s been raised here but as i started this thread maybe I should.

Lets remember that the Victors get to write the bulk of history, that not to condone what the Nazi’s did but remember that all sides will commit what would be called war crime; it just depends on who wins. Of cause im NOT including the holocaust as this was an indefensible crime.

I don’t like to think of this in terms politics or of what government did, more of the suffering and bravery of those who did the dirty work. I try to imagine you’re self as the 19yr old suffocating inside of a tank fighting only to stay alive!
So I suppose model making is in some strange way a tribute to those who lived and died in those terrible times.

Oh as yes they made very big Tanks!!! And lets face it a Churchill V Panther whos the better looking!
[:D]

I’m rather facinated with the AAA and Flack guns that tried to blow my fathers Halifax out of the sky as well as the A/C he was douling with as Midupper Gunner.

I must be honest and say that I love armor all around, present and past, however I must admit that I have an affinity for WWII German armor and this might sound a bit silly but it’s mostly because they were so massive, they have a great desing and look all around ready to put up a big and hard fight…

This is true. An interesting example of this is the treatment of merchant ship crews by submariners who had just sunk the merchant ship. The “awful Hun” generally either ignored the floating merchantmen or, if the situation allowed, showed them so basic human kindness. On the other hand, American submariners regularly machine-gunned Japanese merchantmen who were floating in the water following a sinking.

American soldiers were certainly not beyond criminal activity and sexual assaults where they had defenseless civilian populations under their control, sadly.

However, based on patterns of behavior of the German soldier in the East, and of course Japanese behavior wherever they fought, I think it’s still pretty clear whose soldiers were overall the worst behaved.

And as to the Holocaust, let’s not forget that, contrary to post-war assertions to the contrary, the common German soldiier was often involved in the Holocaust, particularly on the Eastern Front. The book Frontsoldaten has lots of interesting stuff about this – the way line german infantrymen participated in the the murder of Jewish civilians, sometimes set up as sort of a sporting event.

I’m a wargamer too, and I notice that the interest in German militaria shown at wargaming conventions goes beyond historical interest and often veers into adulation. I have a fellow wargamer friend who is Jewish and who has no problem wargaming WWII on the German side, but still shakes his head in amazement at the t-shirts you see worn by people admiring the work of such units as LSSAH, Das Reich and Totenkopf (all of which committed war crimes), and the insistance so many have on always playing the Germans. It takes me a little aback too, I must admit.

The ironic thing about this is that many of these self-same people are big-time flag wavers for the USA – conservative patriot types. Why they don’t back the USA all the way completely baffles me. (I don’t want to allow my self to think about whether that is the direction they want the USA to go in.)

Sorry to take this is this direction, but I think it has to be said that these issues are the elephant in the room in a discussion of this topic.

Well, my intentions were not to turn this thread into a political discussion and I apologize for the trend that way. I merely wanted to state my personal preference when modeling German armor to stay away from SS topics. Erock, I totally understand why someone would model Wittmann’s Tiger and I don’t oppose it. However, I find no interest in modeling subjects like that myself. By the way, I think we are all waiting for some updated pics of that bad boy.

Larry, so that guy I saw about a month ago with the Das Reich t-shirt on was not a Nazi? Knowing what the symbol was, I found myself giving the poor guy a pretty dirty look and almost said something to him.

Ya gotta love us “Tread-Heads”

If nothing else, we ARE a passionate bunch! [;)]

Darn tootin’! Frinstance, my passion for cottage cheese knows no bounds!

[:p]

here’s a topic that is incredibly interesting !
my thoughts:
to model any subject is not necessarily to glorify it ( the fact that i am not a fan of the Waffen SS didn’t keep me from using the decals that came with my Hasegawa Panzer iv… but i did have to think about it at least twice before i did)
and a plastic model isn’t going to do any damage !

war by it’s nature is a terrible thing (ask R.E.Lee; “It is well that war is so terrible lest we grow too fond of it.”- that is just about the most appropriate sig for this forum anyone could ever find !) and war machines do kill. finding any sort of justification in terms of the “rightness” of killing one’s opponent because they’re “the bad guy” does little to diminish the fundamental horror of it IMHO. i dream of a world in which we are able to work out our problems without loss of life on ANY side… i also know that we are far from that state now, and that some things are worth fighting for. i just wish we didn’t have to…[V]
please don’t think i blame those whose job it is to fight for this sorry state of affairs. i respect and honor all those who serve their country !

why do any of us build what we build ? when i look at the piles of kits in my local hobby shop, i just pick out stuff that looks interesting to me. i like the look of some afv’s just like i am attracted to certain cars and not others. as i’m learning more about afv’s, the historic aspect grows in importance, but i still wouldn’t build something i didn’t like the looks of… am i too superficial, or just guilty of wanting to enjoy my modeling time & the results of my effort ?

the sheer amount of variations in German armor offer so many possibilities, and the number of kits available is so huge that u will be hard pressed to avoid building at least one or two pieces if u do more than a few models of afvs. (even General Shermanfreak has owned up to building a German item…)
the variety in camouflage as mentioned in another post is yet another factor (good practice subjects for airbrushing !)

Finally: u can always model modern german armor like the Leopard or Marder 1A3 … we’re all such good friends in NATO these days ! [;)]

frosty[:)]

No need to apologize, this is a good discussion[:D] Soooo…

Time for me to spout here a bit. Like I said, I like all of the variety presented by German WWII vehicles!!! Many of them are just COOL looking. Of course, I like Shermans and Chaffees too!

As far as engineering goes, yes, the plate work on the hulls and turrets of those tanks is second to none, as was the armament! Let’s not forget that this same ‘attention to detail’ kept the Germans from turning out the numbers of tanks they needed, along with their inability to figure out which tank they wanted as their ‘main battle tank’ cost them a lot. Why would a country that had an excellent tank like the Panther want to mess with a King Tiger? Big gun? Big deal. Lots of armor? Lots of weight! Underpowered, hard to transport, useless in urban warfare… Cool looking?? OH YES!! Great to model? YOU BET!! But not much good as an all round fighter in places like Aachen.
German WWII tanks were also noisy and I’m not talking about their engines (although the Maybach really barks, as did the Pershing… the M5 on the other hand, was as quiet as a mouse! … I guess it had to be! LOL). And yes, if the Allies could hear a MkVI coming two kilometers off, they could call in air support to knock it out. That’s not only due to loud engines but also due to the dry pin or ‘dead’ track they used (which ate up fuel!). Of course, on the other hand were the half tracks with individual roller bearings in each shoe… talk about a maintenance headache! Quiet though… but so is a rubber bushed live track, like on the Sherman.
The US tanks were second to none for ease of operation, maintenance (except for that Chrysler Multi-bank!), and were fairly comfortable for the crew. On a PzKpfw III, the TC had to straddle the gun guard when seated in the back of the turret and it was CRAMPED back there! (been there, tried that) Not my idea of a good TC’s position when you have to move around all over the place looking for targets. Of course neither was the single periscope on the Sherman’s split hatch. But that at least could be swiveled with one hand by the TC who was fairly comfortable on his little butt pad (those goofy round seats US tanks had in WWII). AND as was pointed out earlier, a Sherman was more likely to make it into battle, because it could cruise like crazy.
Good engineering doesn’t always mean complicated engineering, which is what the Germans tended to do with much of their WWII armor. Were they good tanks? Without a doubt. Could they have been better if they were simpler? Depends on what ‘better’ means. There’s little doubt there’d have been more of them if the Germans would have allowed for butt plate welding, rather than interlocking corners. Yes, it’s much stronger in construction, but once a 17 pounder pierces the side plate or an air to ground missile blows the tank onto its back, what does it matter? Are they fun to model? OF COURSE!!

Finally, my opinion on the moral of modeling war is fairly simple. It’s part of history and remembering history is good. Yes of course, war is terrible and there are war crimes. There are also civilian crimes (rape, murder, etc) committed every day. But, all of this, good and bad, is part of our human history… and it goes back a lot longer than I… and that’s a LOOOONNNNGGG time!. I’ve met several dozen WWII US vets, a few German and Soviet WWII vets and they’re all pretty much the same as individuals. They all remember the funny as well as the horrible things that happened to them. None of them started the wars they were in, they were just told to serve their countries and follow orders. None of them admitted to doing anything criminal during the war, but who would? All of them said they still had nightmares about battle… 50 years later.
Personally, I think that service to one’s country is a great honor (considering that only around 3% of all Americans have servied in the military), and I’ve felt that way since I enlisted in 1975 when the American people, as a whole, hated soldiers.
So, I guess what I’m saying is have fun modeling, try to be accurate if that’s your intent… sometimes it isn’t, right? … and (for a heavy ending here) people in any military do what they do for various reasons, adventure, a way ‘up’ in society, because they were conscripted, because they want a challenge, because they want to serve their countries or think they’ll be considered heroes, or as in my case, because I wanted to play with armored vehicles![:D][:D][:p]
I’ve found that veterans, no matter where they come from are pretty much the same and are, as a whole, as fine a group of men and women as you’d ever care to meet.

Spouting finished. for now.

Have a GREAT weekend all!

Ron.

All armor is designed for one purpose that we all understand,weather used by friend or foe. It comes down to what draws a person to armor. Is it the techincal aspect or the shear size and force they project? Many here are or have been on tank crews and can tell of the feeling of riding on or commanding their first track. Or the first tank you ever seen and you were hooked on armor and have carried that feeling over to modeling.For myself as modeler, I build tanks not to express the political use of the machine but to recreate a part of history that I’m drawn to.

In todays National Guard there are no weekend warriors

We should have a show of hands to see how many of us who like German armor (and I do, despite all my comments) began their admiration for the vehicles when they first saw THE BATTLE OF THE BULGE. [:P]

Great topic, I will keep my answer simple, I enjoy building armor vehicles because they are an interesting part of military history in WW2. I build all countries armor depending on how much I like the subject. As to the political stuff[}:)], my take on that is that as long as we learn from history so as not to repeat it, I see no reason why it can’t be modeled. Of course as in anything there will be people who will go overboard but I think most of people can keep a proper perspective.

wow, u said it all right here !
and thank u for serving, especially at a time in our history when it wasn’t necessarily a popular choice… i agree wholeheartedly with ur last statement re: veterans. when i look at the programs on the history channel with interviews from people who were involved in combat, i’m often struck by the similarities between the stories from soldiers on both sides !
best wishes,
frosty[:)]

Well, my hand is up for German armor! US, Japanese, British, French… Soviet… all have made vehicles that I really like and my other hand is up for them. I’ve an affinity toward Stuarts because the first tank I ever played in was an M3A3 (and if I’d have had $2000 laying around in 1967, I’d have bought it!). I like M109’s, M60’s, M1’s, etc, because I’ve crewed them (I’d rather go the the tank tables on a slick '60 than an M1… MUCH more fun to gun, without all the added computer equipment! Of course, I’d rather go to war in an M1! … I also have a preference the same way to the M109 through the A5 for going to a firing point… warfare? The Paladin wins hands down…). So, having been around tanks since 3rd grade, I can’t say what drew me to them… I think it’s their solidity and the exotic appearance (and variety) of their engineering.
Like any vehicle, give engineers from five different countries the same criteria, power plant, armament and crew and they’ll come up with five different designs… the sheer variety in armored vehicles is just cool.

Ron.

Just went to Track-Link the other day. In the gallery section there is 810 posts of German WW II armor as opposed to 100+ for USA

German armor does have the numbers in variety of kits, but 100 dollars says almost every modeler out there has at least one or two sherman or variations in his collection.

Thanks Frosty,

But really, I’m just ‘in’ so I can play with the ‘toys’ and work with my crew.[:D] Live fire this weekend! Steel on target! Woooo Hoooo![:D][:D][:p]

Ron.