More proof to the old saying “On any given Sunday”. If you really want to prove the theory, then go ahead and enter into multiple shows. One day, with one set of judges it will win something, on the next show with a different set it may not win anything and the third time you might walk away with the prize. If you are trying to show the inconsistency in judging, or to work yourself up over how well you didn’t do and thought you should have, as seen all to often, then by all means…go ahead. Some people thrive on the attention of awards. I like to keep those guys filed away because they invariably are the first to say “build for yourself, not the judges” . Then get all pouty when they are not handed the trophy they expected.
I’ve seen some models heavily campaigned, and I mean heavily. Even to the point of guys going home and making changes to the kit they entered based on the comments they got when they cornered the judge. And going to another show the following weekend to see if it would win. This sort of tail chasing is pointless in my book but vastly entertaining since my first sentence…On any given Sunday, applies. These are the guys that usually have the melt down as they pack up, or endlessly whine on the forums, making for very entertaining reading and are fun to poke with a stick to see if stuff falls out or more flies and bees fly out.
AMPS is kind of non point when it comes to judging, since rather than the IPMS rules of 1,2,3 and is ultimately a case of being the best of the worst that day, AMPS uses open judging and if you bring gold, you’ll get gold. So there are no blocks, no sweeps limiters, if there are 10 golds entered, 10 golds will be awarded. Now because of the Any given Sunday principle of judging, its still possible to campaign a model and get what you’re looking for, but I like to think that AMPS is a little tougher on the front end so it makes it harder.
Ultimately I guess its to each his own. If campaigning and building for judges is what drives you, I applaud your effort. I like those guys, because not only do they pay the entry fees, but because some are so desperate to win something, they gladly pay the extra to enter more stuff in the hopes of “chumming the water and something will bite”. They make contests look good and are usually a wealth of model building information. If it makes them happy, thats all that matters. (to them). Others get the perks because they (campaigners) love to talk about their entries, how much work they put into them and the techniques they use. Its like a seminar. Everybody wins.
Personaly I enter once and figure if I didn’t do well enough that day, it will be up to my next model build to do better. Obviously it wasn’t good enough to medal. But I use the entry to make myself work a little harder and challenge my own skills as well as a focus point to solicit input from other builders. Being in the design and graphics field for over 30 years, criticism doesn’t bother me. I learn from it and use what I think works and disregard what I feel to be useless, inane or just plain stupid.