I once flew on an Embrear Turboprop (about 21 seats), and the flight attendent came by and asked a couple of us to move to different locations. It was kind of odd in that some moved forward, others moved aft, in addition to moving from one side of the plane to the other. Since it was a small plane, with 2 seats per row on one side and only 1 seat per row on the other, I guess maybe side to side loadout may have been more significant for that type arrangement [:O].
American Eagle (the fancy name for what had been Chapparal Air Service) flew Saab 320 twins out of Easterwood Field (CLL). Carry-ons went in a “canoe” under the fuselage. Under 25 seat, so no Flight Attendant required. The Gate agent walked you across the tarmac, and let you sort out finding your seat. Once the carry-ons were packed on the checked baggage, the senior baggage handler would stick hi head in the a/c and recommend passenger shifts based on the weight of the stuff loaded aboard.
Was right at 45-55 minutes gate to gate to DFW (depending on how long the taxi was to the AmEagle hardstand was) on a 30-35 minute flight. My favorite seat was 2B which might as well have been a cockpit jumpseat.
Passenger traffic increased to the point that they put on a larger two-engine T winged Saab, which had overhead bins and an actual Flight Attendant. Roomier but just not the same.
AmEagle later replaced all their Saabs with Embrears in various sizes, with a twin engine about the size of the small Saab, and a High Winged bird with a cargo/baggage section just aft of the cockpit.
All of which were a significant upgrade from the olden days, when the only air service was Rio Airways, who flew DeHaviland Otters. Fixed nading gear high wing STOL birds where you had to step up to the seat, and duck down at the same time, and you had to be careful to not hit your head o nthe wingspar, or trip on the landing gear spar.
Long time ago I was stationed in Wichita Falls for a few weeks. One day we had our attention called to a T-29 that had made a very hard landing the night before. Front end was a trike plane, the rear a tail dragger, almost. Tail a couple of feet off the ground, but massive wrinkles just behind the wing. That must have hurt!
The first one looks more like a tie down, the third is a freighter, but the second one though small does look convincing. Good luck there is no egg on face emoticon…Oh no, they are going to find one of those too[um]
Those are really clean looking DC-3’s in a nice livery back there, too.
Learn something new every day. Those -3s belonged to the national airline ABA. The name “Swedish Air Lines” appears on their aircraft at some point, but is a frustrating internet search.
That was absorbed into the SAS system in 1950, according to wiki.
John, the AK Air shot is at Sea-Tac’s N passenger terminal which is a very busy place for Alaska Air. It wouldn’t be a tie-down place. It is used nearly 24 hours a day.
Funny you should mention the Viscount by Vickers . We had a neighbor who flew for Capitol .he called them Turbo - Plops .Well , one did fall short of the inbound leg and dug into our pasture .
That was back in Buffalo N.Y.Years and years ago . T.B.
when I was a loadmaster in the South African AF in the early 90’s we used C-54 (DC-4) and the forst thing we did when the plane got to a stop was to get out in put in the tailpost to the buldge under the tail.
It was not because the plane was a tailsitter normally but when all the Pax use to walk to the rear of the plane to exit the port side rear door it moved the CG dangerousely to the rear and then the plane could tail sit , hence the post.
Its been a while but I think it was in the rear carco hold.
As the loadmaster there was a ryme we had to tell the flight engineer and a little canvass bag to store the main and nose undercart down locks in after we showed him they were removed.
The locks were metalblocks that stopped the mail UC from folding, same with the pin on the nose gear.
For the first flight we had to “walk the props” turning the engines to clear any collected oil in the bottom cilynders.
Then I can still recall the startup - the engineer would start #3 first after a good priming of fuel “12 blades cold start turning 3” then he would count 3,6,9 and on 12 engage the egnition switch. After some spluttering a few bangs and smoke the engine would settle down into a nice steady drone
This would be done for #4 then #2 and then #1 (1 being port outer engine)
I have some nice detail pix of the undercart bay and engine and undercatr I will post if needed. I took it of a DC4 that is at the field where I work.
Pretty sure you can convert the military C-54 into a DC-4, if you aren’t concerned with interior. Could your local hobby shop order the DC-4 for you, if you’d prefer the civilian version? Its the Revell #04937.