Oujé-Bougoumo
I mean, I HAD to giggle that one.
According to Wikipedia: 725 people. Your mission is to go count 'em. Maybe tonight in the bar.
Don’t blame ya.
Don Kelly liked the word “Oujé-Bougoumo” so much he said it several times at the beginning of one of his shows.[:D]
I suppose I should have worded the original post better, also I was lacking when it came to sources. My intention was more a question of any personal experiences. You do raise some valid points and I’m sorry if I offended any directly or indirectly. Though I stand by my original argument I do see your side of the argument and I hopes we can both respect each others opinions.
Yes sir, I agree and sincerely apologize for the “troll” comment, that was completely undeserved.
I have never encountered any comments about anything I’ve modeled from a “PC” perspective, but as I’ve said I put no stock in the concept anyways.
I did get literally thrown off a forum once for posting a picture of a stark naked young lady, from the backside. Rather lovely figure, but I did break the rules.
That’s a shame, I always found it odd that the human body is somehow off limits but I digress. I’m glad we settle our diferences amicably.
If nothing else works-
almost anything can be patched up with a little bondo, man ! [:D][Y]
Good to hear things are getting back to normal around here.[:P]
Sounds like we have reached the point where a round of fermented beverages is in order. Preferably served by appropriately garbed attractive ladies 
Beer! Beer! Beer! Said the Privates!
Merry Men are we!
But none so fair that they can compare to the Airborne Infantry!
[B]
Whiskey for the men and beer for their horses …! [:D]
Bondo is in the rum!
ah yes, a great song!
Hello!
It’s kinda like the old forums are back again! Now let us build some models! Good luck with that and have a nice day
Paweł
OK lads, enough talk and let grab a drink and back to the the bench for that wonnerful smell of plastic!
I don’t drink so i am afraid i will have to find somthing else to enjoy as well as keping my hands busy.
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM, now, what could i do.
From the looks of that pic, that should be easy![:D]
Gary
I have no idea what your talking about i’m afraid [whstl]
…probably means being helpful by retrieving the empties and returning with more beer…[;)]
…always gives me a good feeling to see so many happy faces…[:D]
Spruce, the info I posted was from when I researched the subject of Wiki’s accuracy
Check this out:
"In 2005, the peer-reviewed journal Nature asked scientists to compare Wikipedia’s scientific articles to those in Encyclopaedia Britannica—“the most scholarly of encyclopedias,” according to its own Wiki page. The comparison resulted in a tie; both references contained four serious errors among the 42 articles analyzed by experts.
And last year, a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology found that Wikipedia had the same level of accuracy and depth in its articles about 10 types of cancer as the Physician Data
Query, a professionally edited database maintained by the National Cancer Institute.
The self-described “free encyclopedia that anyone can edit” has fared similarly well in most other studies comparing its accuracy to conventional encyclopedias, including studies by The Guardian, PC Pro, Library Journal, the Canadian Library Association, and several peer-reviewed academic studies."
from http://www.livescience.com/32950-how-accurate-is-wikipedia.html [:)]
Doog:
Thanks for the info.
I’ll check it out.
I would still very much prefer that notations posted in in Wikipedia web pages stating: " This article needs additional citations for verification" actually refer to those items requiring verification.