…as has been said [wow]…1/72!
Well you wouldn’t know they were a pain in the arse by looking at the finished product, excellent work!
Beautiful works there, Ravor
The 234 is such a pretty bird
excellent work razordws, I like the 4 engined version. I have built several dragon kits and love the level of detail and accuracy in there kits. Getting one together and looking good is a sign of an excellent modeler and your’s look great. The late war splinter camo is very well done on both of them. I don’t think I’ve seen a a 4 engined example built always the 2 engine. i agree with the others the winter camo is very eye catching and well excuted.
I have a dragon me262 mistel I keep looking at but fear I will go nuts trying to build 2 dragon 262’s and the support equiptment at the same time. That’s alot of headache in one box[:)]
Thanks guys, I appreciate your comments! [:)]
I would have to agree with that evaluation but in the end the reward should be worth the effort.
Dave , they look great.
I admire anyone prepared to take on a single Dragon kit, let alone 4.[bow]
Looking forward to the other two.
Karl
Flippin’ eck Dave!!
They are superb! You have got a couple of master class builds there. Well done![tup][tup][tup]
Karl, haven’t seen or heard from you in awhile. Good to see you on the forums. As mentioned in my original post I have never built a dragon (aircraft) kit before so I had no idea what I was getting into. Lot’s of this[:O]… and this [banghead].
One of the other 234’s had a cracked canopy and dragon didn’t come through with a replacement so I finished building a vac box this morning with my son who needs to replace one on a warhammer tank. One of those special father/son moments (everyone say awwwww!!!) We tried it out and I think I’m going to be vac happy for awhile [:D] Worked like a charm.
Tango, Thanks for the O.T.T.!
[oX)][;)]
Well deserved!
Excellent job fella. If you had probs and fit issues. Noone would know. They look superb. Like the others my fav is the winterised scheme. Was that a recognised scheme? Never seen it before.
…Guy
Guy, the scheme came from an Aeromaster sheet. It’s listed as 9/kg 76 - Captured and tested by the USAAF in 1945.
A pair of 234’s… so would that make it a 468?[D)]
Seriously though, they look outstanding, and i really am loving the unusual camo scheme. That’s just something not seen every day…[tup]