The forensic dental analysis is proof beyond a reasonable doubt of his death in Berlin. Read the report to which I’ve previously linked and see if you can dispute its conclusions.
No one is disputing the conclusions of the dental records. It’s the source of those records that could be suspect.
The victors always write the history. Is all the information that we have been provided over the years all one hundred percent true?
Could there have been reasons to alter, if not downright misrepresent, those conclusions?
All (and I do mean, all) information that we are given is subject to scrutiny, regardless of source.
That’s about the same as folks who think BinLaden was killed in Tora Bora in 2001, but we held onto the remains for 10 years and a new administration to take credit for.
Its just tabloid TV. What’s the old saying? Believe none of what you hear and only half of what you see…
I just think that if such a thing were to have occured, it would have been impossible to keep secret.