Sorry I ment to say a threat to the panzers.
Is there a way to edit are post after posting them. ?
Gee whiz guys, I’d been thinking of tossing in a Tasca/Asuka M4A3E2 ‘Jumbo’ Sherman… great minds think alike maybe? Can you have too many Jumbos???
Since we’re going a year I might go with a Dragon Panther Ersatz M10 as well, will have to see how it goes…
Blackdog: The Jumbo came from the factory with a 75mm but some did get rearmed with a 76mm from field maintenance shops near the front lines. It was one of the few Anglo-American tanks that could take a direct hit from an 88mm without penetration.
Oh and you can edit your post by clicking on the tiny yellow pencil icon down at the SW corner.
Yes, in 1945, some Jumbo’s were up gunned with the 76mm gun used on other versions of the M4 family, by ordnance workshops. When coupled with the 76mm “hyper shot” round (Armor Piercing Discarding Sabot), it was positively the most lethal US tank in the ETO until the Pershing debuted. It had the armor to shrug off the majority of the German weapons in use except at point blank range. Even the dreaded 88 needed a lucky hit such as thru a sight aperture to penetrate the frontal armor at standard combat ranges. A few Jumbos even had their bow MG replaced with a flame thrower to take out pillboxes and other similar fortifications.
I didn’t know all that about the Jumbo, was it just bolted on extra armour or was it a completely new design. Great info again guys.
Stik: That Jumbo’s gonny be an interesting build!
Bish: The Jumbo was a normal Sherman with additional armor werded to the front and sides and a new, uparmored turret as well AFAIK.
Cliff: Stop giving me ideas! I wanted to build my M10-Kitten for quite a while now…
I think I’ll just go for it:
- Tasca M4A3E8
- Dragon King Tiger Porsche w/Zimmerit
- AFV-Club M10
- Dragon Panther/M10
I want to build as many allied vehicles as German ones, so I had to find something to go along with that disguised Panther. And what else is such a good counterpart as a “real” M10? [;)]
Bish: Yeah, the Sherman wasn’t the best tank at anything but dang that thing was versatile, I think you could get alway with having a pretty good modeling career building nothing but M4s.
Clemons: The Dragon Ersatz M10 is a nice kit. Their Panther is a fine kit already plus the sheet metal disguise has some really fine molding. I think the only way to get the disguise to scale would be PE sheets but their plastic pieces are much easier to assemble and pretty close to scale thickness.
SS having a Panther/M 10 and the real thing would be a nice comparison. My vote goes for those.
Gamera, you can see why we went for the Sherman and Pz IV for the badges. Two very versatile tanks as well as the main stays of their respective forces.
Bish: Good thinking there and not sure if I said if before or not but all three are really sharp looking badges!
Thanks. I have re worked the text a bit, so it should stand out a bit more.
I’m glad I stopped in today, I had completely forgotten about this GB. I still have a bunch of Shermans in the stash, but seeing as I’m wrapping up two at the moment, I may just stick with a Pershing. I have the HobbyBoss “Super” and a Tamiya kit still un-touched, and have been feeling an urge to do something with the Super for a while, so that’ll likely be my entry.
I’ve got to take a look in the library, somewhere I have Belton Cooper’s book and IIRC, there’s a nice pic of the Super it in, maybe before they added the extra turret armor.
No worries RBaer, it has been a couple of months since this was first posted, which is why I thought I would just put in a little reminder. Its easy to forget when the GB isn’t actually running.
The Jumbo was a cross of the two. Army Ground Forces planners knew that they were gonna run into the defensive fortifications of the Siegfried Line so they took the basic M4A3 75mm 47* hull and added on a welded layer of armor to the sides and glacis that in essence doubled their thickness and protection. A much thicker transmission cover was also cast for the Jumbo. A new turret was designed specificaly for the Jumbo, again more heavily armored, which looked similar to the T23 turret used on 76mm Shermans, but provided much greater protection. It originally was armed with the 75mm gun, as this was deemed to have a better HE round for its’ intended support role. But the trunions for the 75mm gun mount and the 76mm gun mount were the same size so up gunning was not overly complicated. All the additional armor increased the weight by something like 10 tons, and reduced the top speed. Due to the additional weight, the “duckbill” extended end connectors were always fitted. They were popular to use as the lead tank in columns as they could shrug off the hits that usually killed standard M4s, and then any ambushing positions would be revealed to the rest of the column without a lead tank being knocked out.
No, it was never “the best”. But when introduced in 1942, it was comparitively equal to the other two prominent Medium Tanks of that time, the Panzer IV and the T-34/76. And yes you could model variants of the M4 family for a long time without repeating yourself.
Sounds like a bit of a beast.
Lol the germans must have felt like they did when they ran into the t-34 and the kv-1 all over again .
My choice for my sherman is dragons 1/35 M4A4 with 60pound rockets my wife got this for me in 97 as a way to calm down after I started contracting I put 3 pieces of track together and didn’t. Have sny idea what or how to handle. Photo etch so its bin siting it also says it has the 17 pounder gun but it looks like the standard 75 mm? It is in British service.
Bish-quick question-would German armor used in the defense of Berlin '45 be considered as ‘West’ or am I pushing the envelope?
@bobbaily: historically, I don’t think you can consider anything in the Berlin vicinity to be considered the “West”. They were surrounded by Soviet Armies. No US or Commonwealth forces were even close.
@blackdog62: the British M4A4 with 60 pdr rockets would have been mounted with the standard 75mm gun and a few of the upgunned 17pdr Fireflies. These were used at the Rhine Crossing by the tanks of a single squadron of the 1st Coldstream Guards. They were called “Sherman Tulips.”
While Berlin was certainly in the heart of eastern Germany, I would debate the second point. At the time that the Soviets began their final push on Berlin in early April from the Oder river, American armor spearheads were roughly an equal distance to the west at the Elbe. mid level comman elements were preparing operational plans to attack with those elements, and possibly combined with an airdrop on Berlin itself by airborne units. Until Eisenhower declared that Berlin was no longer an objective of the Western Armies. The German forces arrayed in front of the Western Allies were weaker than those in front of the Soviets, as the bulk of the German forces in that area were oriented towards the east.
Arguably US forces could have reached Berlin before the Soviets, but then they would have become bogged down in the city fighting that followed. Eisenhower wanted to avoid those casualties sustained in a drive to an area that would be handed over to the Soviets postwar.
Just a curious. question. At the time we was fighting at the finnal American zone in germany did the us army still have the little. Stewarts/m3 still being used in the recon units? Or the vicker for the brits for that matter ?
In Europe the M5 Stuart saw service until the end. They were being replaced by M24s as production was ramping up on those. The M3 Lights were pretty much only for training in the US by that time. Some Commonwealth units were still using the M3A3 though in both ETO and CBI. I think that the Vickers was long gone from Commonwealth units by 1942.