Speaking of Round 2 and the reissuing of older molds, I have purchased the Lindberg Blockade Runner and just the other day the AMT USS Akron/Macon Airship. On the boxes of both is a “Made in America” logo. Granted, the fits are still not perfect but it was nice buying something that was made here!
On the camera front, many of the companies are or have been intermixed in a fluid, oriental sort of way.
So, Vivitar was Pentax, just headquartered in Hong Kong. They were building to Pentax specs, but using PRC labor for parts assembly. Was a staple in BX & PX though, as AAFEX did not care “where from” as much as “how much” for their product. The Vivtar lenses have some cache out in the photog world, at least in the pro side, rather than prosumer side.
Such national distinctions mean very little in these days of international, web-based trade. It’s the quality of the product rather than the nation of origin. Which is why IBM does not even bother to relabel Lenovo products.
Well, other than the Las Colonias operation in Mexico. This is where Border-adjacent cities are set up to use less-expensive Mexican labor to create sub assemblies and parts. Thse are then trucked over the border for final assembly so that they can have a “Made in America” label. Which is somewhat spurious as that “made” refers to bolting on wheels and tires; or fastening that last 8 of 16 screws holding chassis and body together (and making a shipping crate or bending a shipping box to suit.
I agree that Airfix and Revell are the good guys and I love what RoG is putting out there. I would just like to see more competition from American sources. We constantly hear from “Corporate America” about the virtues of capitalism, but American producers are the least responsive to capitalistic forces within our own hobby. Wouldn’t it be nice for all to see Revell/Monogram USA (and Lindbergh, if they can produce anything worthwhile) dive back into the manufacturing market? It’s just a thought.
Excuse me - declining numbers, increasing labor and production costs - how has the consolidation, shut down, and off-shoring of production by American companies NOT been squarely capitalistic? I don 't like it, but there’s no willpower to change the entire world enough in the short term. What would work would be for population in the producing countries to realize more wealth (this is happening in China ) and drive up the costs of production in that country. Tamiya has its production done in the Philippines now, and I hear that Vietnam is doing things because it’s cheaper than China. As those costs and shipping costs rise, it will become more cost effective at some point to bring the production back to the US.
I just hope there’s a company or two left by then!
I was simply referring to the lack of will to engage in competition with the manufacturers from overseas. The aspects of capitalism that you mention well illustrate why I am not a capitalist!
I don’t really see that, more that the higher costs of doing it here means that it’s more of an investment for less net profit. Revell released the 72nd Gato, the 48th PV-1, Mobius did the 72nd Skipjack (If I gotta stay on ships) and a bunch of science fiction kits, Merit has the PTs, OSA, and CV-5 kit (you may count these differently because it’s an American distributor hiring an chinese company for design and molding).
If, by “lack of will” you mean bringing out similar subjects as asian manufacturers, well, even the asian manufacturers are trying to avoid that other than Trumpeter. Academy is now out of the ship model business after Trumpeter released two subjects that were similar to theirs. The other manufacturers I have talked to are very conscious of pent up desire for a subject and will target ones where there is no competition first to maximize their revenue.
I understand what you are saying. And, yes, I am talking about ships. It was Revell of Germany that originally produced the 1/72 USS Gato; Revell/Monogram simply repackaged that kit. True, Mobius did produce the 1/72 USS Skipjack, but has yet to produce anything else in the years since then. Merit is a Chinese company that is illustrating my point. While Mobius manufactured the Skipjack several years ago, Merit is or has produced the USS Yorktown, USS Enterprise, and USS John F. Kennedy. Trumpeter has also been a most prolific ship model producer. Dragon will soon be releasing a 1/350 USS Pennsylvania. Lindbergh’s repackaging the old Eaglewall and Pyro kits hardly bears comparison.
I am simply saying that the American companies seem content to simply repackage kits that over half a century old. Mobius might be an exception, but, to date, they have only released one ship kit that is now several years old. I am not saying that American companies should simply manufacture ships already released by other manufacturers; on the contrary, I would like to see them jump back into the market with something fresh, something not yet manufactured. But, they seem to be shunning competition with foreign manufacturers instead of jumping into the market and competing with new products. It would be nice to see a new American product!
Listen , the " Hot Rod Hydroplane " was a very early MONOGRAM kit . It came out at the same time as their 1/32 scale Rubber powered ski Boat ( guessing the scale on this one ). They also had the U.D.T boat not long after . Looked good next to LINDBERG’s L.C.V.P. This was in 1958 or thereabouts . At the same time they had the " Midget Racer " and the " Offy " powered Indy Car ! T.B.
Thats bad news about Academy leaving the Ship Model genre. I really do like the kits that they made, and they tended to be as good as and more affordable than Trumpeter’s offerings.
Airfix has done some nice new stuff in 1/350 ships. I do wish that Revell would follow their lead and do some new tool 1/350 ship kits. Or maybe some larger scale kits of smaller craft.
Merit is an American distributor that has hired a Chinese company. So, while the design and molding work was done in China, it was American capital and risk and therefore I included them. Mobius’ Skipjack is a classic example of jumping into the market and competing - sometimes you bring a new subject to market that “under performs” and hurts your return and leaves you with less money to use on the next project. They also contracted out to a Chinese company for the CAD and molding. Airfix has their kits molded elsewhere and I believe that they also contract out the CAD, but I’m not as sure about that. Really, the new model is to hire out, unfortunately.